Kommentare zu: The VBI-BSE

Von: Zlatoděj J.T.

Zlatoděj J.T. — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:19:52 +0000

The voynich manuscript is writen and encrypted in the Czech language.
Author manuscript = czech alchemist 15th century John of Lazy.
Real name manuscript = Gold Mud. (1454).
Translated 50 pages manuscript.

Hi Josef Zlatoděj.
(Manuscript can not resolve the English language)

Von: DianeO'Donovan

DianeO'Donovan — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:11:17 +0000

I decided,after writing about 50 posts in my own blog, to check how my points were doing.

I don’t understand a couple of your inferences
1) an assumption that „a non-European language“ can never be accompanied by „european-style illustrations“
2) that if northerners wrote/transcribed texts in a foreign language, there should be no resemblance to the [scribe’s]normal European italic.
3) That if no-one can disprove an explanation of the manuscript’s form, content, etc., then the explanation must be bullshit!? So is the theory of natural selection bullshit, or do I have to accept the idea of intelligent design before I can consider natural selection a valid explanation.

With all due respect, your are not only good at evaluating bullshit, but brilliant at creating it. Well done, you.

I have about 50 points, I gather … 25 because I consider fine details in the imagery; and 15 because I think the language is probably non-European.

I wont count the 35 for unfalsifiable argument, because I‘m sure I‘m wrong in spots, at least.

Von: Michael

Michael — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:34:31 +0000

Didn’t the Voynich maidens come from the masthead of MAD Magazine in the 50s?

(I claim 3 points, from this one: „3 points for each historical declaration in the theory which contradicts the few surely known facts.“)

Von: Elias Schwerdtfeger

Elias Schwerdtfeger — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 04:37:32 +0000

Oh, my own score?

always 10…

plus 12 for six years of „reading“…

plus 3 for assuming, that the manuscript was generated by a „psychological process“, which is unfalsifiable…

plus 3 for identifing f68r3 „doary“ as the pleiades…

plus 4 for my harmony rules, which are more a visual issue and just slightly above statistical relevance…

gives me a total of 32 points and I‘m still going for the hi-score.

Von: Patrick Lockerby

Patrick Lockerby — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:06:56 +0000

After I had finished laughing, I found that I had scored a number midway between 12 and 14. Does this indicate that I have a rational, scientific and unsuperstitious approach to the VM?

Von: Marke Fincher

Marke Fincher — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:21:34 +0000

Nice one…
Of course you must have scored yourself Elias?

Care to „spill the beans“ ?

Von: Julian Bunn

Julian Bunn — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:46:58 +0000

Brilliant: very amusing, and thanks for the translation.

Von: Dennis

Dennis — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:44:16 +0000

Many thanks, Elias, for making this available for us language-challenged Americans! If you don’t know, that’s a nice way of saying, „stupid,“ „retarded,“ or „handicapped.“